As a lawyer, Edwin Rojas, deputy of the Parliamentary Bloc of the Homeland in the National Assembly, said that the figure of the impeachment or political sanction does not apply in the case of the President of the Republic in Venezuela, in response to the proposed declaration of a political accountability that promotes the right wing within the Parliament.
He recalled that Venezuela’s legislature is under the subordination of the Executive branch, headed by the President of the Republic, so that an impeachment does not proceed. However, there is the figure of the pre-trial of merit, which must be validated and authorized by the Supreme Court of Justice, under the Constitution of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela.
Rojas, in a clear example of what he qualified as a crass ignorance, said the opposition plans to repeat the actions taken by the Congresses of Honduras, Paraguay and Brazil, which resulted in the dismissal of their Presidents.
«Venezuela is not Brazil, Honduras nor Paraguay, and it is not in the constitutional scope, because our constitutional doctrine does not allow political judgments to the figure of the Head of State and the declaration of a political responsibility that makes the National Assembly is for individual staff, different to the President of the Republic «, he said.
He warned that the right wing has sought to make see the Assembly as a supra power over other powers, so he recalled that the Constitution provides for five powers: Executive, Legislative, Judicial, Citizen and Electoral powers, and the President of the Republic is the head of the five powers, however, «Ramos Allup intended to conduct the State since he came to the AN.»
AN continues in contempt:
Until the Venezuelan Parliament does not abide by the judgments of the Electoral Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice, which establishes the divestiture of the three candidates of Amazonas state, they will continue in contempt of court and its decisions are void, lack of legality, recalled Rojas citing Article 138 of the Constitution.
In this regard, he clarified that while this power is in contempt of the court, the Constitutional Chamber of the TSJ will give «administrative continuity to the State, ie, the country can not be stopped because the NA is in contempt».
A not serious opposition:
Rojas was concerned about the position taken by the opposition leaders, who after sending Jesus «Chuo» Torrealba as their spokesman in the dialogue board, lambasted this initiative through the social networks. «They have no pants, nor seriousness, to address a problem such as the national politics. »
The opposition called for the involvement of external actors in the Dialogue Commission proposed by President Nicolas Maduro and were invited the former Presidents Rodriguez Zapatero, from Spain; Leonel Fernandez, from Dominican Republic; and Martin Torrijos, from Panama; but «as they did not lend themselves to go before the world and say there is a dictatorship in Venezuela, then the former Presidents are not good».
Added to this, there were immediate reactions from the presence of the special envoy of the Vatican, Emil Paul Tscherrig, at the dialogue table. «As now the envoy of the Pope has not lend himself to their radical policies, they give a kick to the table and since the Pope blessed President Maduro then the Vatican is not good neither.»
AHORA:
