All decisions adopted by the National Assembly are “unrightful and void” for flouting the judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the injunction against the partial amendment of the Regulation of Interior and Debates of the National Assembly (AN) presented by the right wing in 2010.
The remark was made by the Deputy of the Homeland Bloc, Ricardo Molina, interviewed in Globovision, who recalled that the Constitutional Court ruled in response to an action brought in 2011 by Juan Caldera, Maria Corina Machado, Eduardo Sigala and Miguel Pizarro. Lawyers Ramon G. Aveledo, Jesús María Casal and Manuel Rojas Perez.
The measure provides for the temporary suspension of Article 57 of the rules of procedure, so that sessions must be convened with 48 hours in advance. It further contemplates that once the agenda is loaded into the automated system, it may not be amended to ensure the preparation of the debate.
Molina recalled that “In the rules of the democratic game there are clearly established bodies that must be respected. The Supreme Court is the highest court; the people says that after a decision of the Supreme Court, what remains is the heavenly court. ”
On the decree that restricts the motions of censure against ministers of the National Government, he said that President Nicolas Maduro is attached to the Constitution.
AHORA:
